Single Spine, Double Spine or Multiple Spine: Solving Labour Conflicts and Making Public Sector Jobs More Rewarding in Ghana
Main Article Content
Abstract
The governments of Ghana and public sector workers have since the country’s independence, well over fifty years ago, been embroiled in a protracted fisticuff all in their quest for a rewarding compensation package that will adequately recompense the latter for the physical and mental efforts they exert at their various places of work. The road to finding a lasting solution to this brawl has been tortuous, bumpy and chequered. Commissions upon commissions have been instituted to among other issues, advise the government on the effective ways of rewarding the country’s labour to stem the tide of labour agitations for an enhanced, equitable and rewarding compensation regime, but this single laudable objective has never been attained. Incessant strikes, threats of strikes and storms of protests continue to greet every government that assumes political power in Ghana. Hardly a year goes passed without a group of labour unions issuing such threats or embarking upon work stoppage either to demonstrate their dissatisfaction with government’s lackadaisical attitude to the implementation of one public sector salary regime or to demand for enhanced remuneration package. The real solution to this age-long problem continues to elude the country. The single-spine pay policy (SSPP), which was touted to be a panacea for the craved for rewarding compensation by Ghana labour has failed to suffice to whet the appetite of public sector workers. So, where do we turn next? This paper traces various attempts both past and present governments have made to find a lasting solution to the protracted labour agitations for enhanced remuneration for a comprehensive, equitable and rewarding compensation package for the public sector workers in Ghana. It enquires into other possible measures of solving the matrices of confronting the onslaught in the labour front to stem the tide of agitations over wages and salaries. The data was obtained from both primary and secondary sources. The primary data comprises of reports by commissions and committees set up to review wages and salaries for the country’s public sector which is supported with information from existing literature on the subject.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors’ Certification
Basic instructions and copyright notice
Full Publication ethics and malpractice statement of the journal Modern Africa could be found here.
In submitting the manuscript to Modern Africa, the authors certify that:
- They are authorised by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The submitted manuscript is original and has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis or working paper), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication has been approved by all the authors and that the authors have full authority to enter into this agreement.
- They warrant and represent that they have the full power and authority to enter into and execute this agreement and to convey the rights granted herein, and that such rights are not now subject to prior assignment, transfer or other encumbrance. This also applies to the text and photo originals attained from other sources (for which the authors have secured the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere).
- Their manuscript contains nothing that is unlawful, libellous, or which would, if published, constitute a breach of contract or of confidence or of commitment given to secrecy.
- In the event that the parties to this agreement, either individually or collectively, are held responsible for damages or the costs of a legal process undertaken by a third party as a result of the authors’ actions under points 1, 2, 3, and 4, the authors agree to release the publisher from the claims of the third party and to compensate the publisher for any resulting legal costs.
- Plagiarism is regarded as a serious offence and leads to the rejection of a manuscript.
- Any violation of the above-mentioned rules leads to the rejection of a manuscript.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement:
Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish in the journal Modern Africa agree to the following terms:
- The journal is no-fee open access journal. That means all content is free and without charges available at journal webpages. Also, authors are not charged for having their papers published in the journal.
- Authors retain the copyright but grant the journal right of first publication in print and online to the journal Modern Africa. The work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal. The license is valid for both electronic and paper copies.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided they add an explicit acknowledgement of its initial publication in the journal Modern Africa.
- Authors grant Modern Africa commercial rights to produce hardcopy volumes of the journal for sale to libraries and individuals, as well as to integrate the work, its title, and its abstract in databases, abstracting and indexing services, and other similar information sources.
- Court of jurisdiction is Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.