Application of the philosophy of late L. Wittgenstein in C. Geertz’s work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26806/fd.v12i2.319Abstract
The topic of this article is the question of cultural relativity in the methodology of anthropology and social sciences. The goalposition of the paper is to describe the anti-anti-relativistic approach of the anthropologist Clifford Geertz, which reflects his interpretation of the Wittgenstein’s late work and his notion of "form of life". Geertz's anti-anti-relativism is the result of his refusal to take the position of a relativist or an ethnocentrist, for several reasons. According to him, the main problem of both camps is the misconception of culture as a non-dynamic and closed whole, which results from the philosophical idea of "ideal" concepts. According to him, such an idea is particularly unsustainable in today's globalized interconnected world. Geertz also draws attention to the dynamic way of forming an identity (subject or culture) through encountering with foreign. For Geertz, a formo of life is a methodological tool which helps to avoid choosing between relativism or anti-relativism and which, in turn, provides a dynamic ground for examining the intertwining of the identities of cultures and social groups.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree that:
1. Authors retain copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publishing. All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows others to share this work under condition that its author and first publishing in this journal was acknowledged.
2. Authors may enter into other agreements for non-exclusive dissemination of work in the version in which it was published in the journal (for example, publishing it in a book), but they have to acknowledge its first publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to make their work available online (for example, on their websites) as such a practice may lead to productive exchanges of views as well as earlier and higher citations of published work (See The effect of open access).